Thread:Ordeaux26/@comment-5959298-20180830221802/@comment-31249551-20180902172201

Matthew Bowyer Fan wrote: Ordeaux26 wrote: I have been thinking about what I should have glies and Hodge's alignment because I could see arguments for either bad or neutral for either of them Maybe we can have determined longer alignments. I don't recall it was said that Holder was taking money so we can't say he is criminal. On the other side he is mean and he is bad cop. When we know nothing about character he is also "Neutral". For example Hodge have on page also Neutral alignment but unlike Holder he is standard cop. Constable at Station Five not good. Many of them are corrupted and even if it wasn't confirmed, I feel that Holder is one of them.

For Example this extra is Neutral: Station House Five constable (The Great Wall I). He doesn't show any agression and even doesn't support Townsend during whole scene of his arrest. I mean nobody defended him but he even didn't laughted when Townsend said he is every night at the bar. He doesn't seems to be close enough with him. you do have a good point but unless we can be sure that he has committed some crime we cant change gim